Kernel vs TilionBrowser Benchmark Comparison
Tilion was ahead in both shared browser benchmarks.
- Shared benchmarks
- 2
- Last run
- October 30, 2026
Scorecard
Median of each benchmark's primary metric; lower is better for Browser lifecycle and higher is better for Browser throughput. Medians within 5% count as roughly even, and a benchmark gets no verdict when either provider completed fewer than 50% of runs.
| Benchmark | Kernel | Tilion | Result | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Browser lifecycle Total lifecycle time · Run October 30, 2026 | 0.22s 100% success | 0.19s 100% success | Tilion faster | 1.13x |
| Browser throughput Actions per second · Run October 30, 2026 | 5.86 actions/s 99% success | 6.91 actions/s 98% success | Tilion higher throughput | 1.18x |
Browser lifecycle
Run October 30, 2026Time to create, connect to, navigate and release a headless browser session, over 100 iterations per run.
Total lifecycle time
Tilion had a 1.13x lower median total lifecycle time (0.19s vs 0.22s for Kernel).
Median total lifecycle time over time
15 runs from July 23, 2026 to October 30, 2026.
Browser throughput
Run October 30, 2026Sequential actions completed per second inside a running headless browser session: 10 actions across 100 sessions.
Actions per second
Kernel
99% successTilion
98% successTilion had a 1.18x higher median actions per second (6.91 actions/s vs 5.86 actions/s for Kernel).
Median actions per second over time
14 runs from July 23, 2026 to October 30, 2026.
Methodology
- One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
- Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
- Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
- How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed at least 50% of runs in 2 or more shared benchmarks run in the last 30 days.
Frequently asked questions
Have another question? Email us.
Tilion was ahead in both shared browser benchmarks. In Browser lifecycle (October 30, 2026), Tilion had a median total lifecycle time of 0.19s versus 0.22s for Kernel, 1.13x faster. In Browser throughput (October 30, 2026), Tilion had a median actions per second of 6.91 actions/s versus 5.86 actions/s for Kernel, 1.18x higher throughput.