Beam and Novita were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks.
Median of each benchmark's primary metric; lower is better. Medians within 5% count as roughly even, and a benchmark gets no speed verdict when either provider completed fewer than 50% of runs.
Time from sandbox creation to the first successful command, with 100 sandboxes launched at the same time.
Time to interactive
Beam had a 2.57x lower median time to interactive (548ms vs 1.41s for Novita).
4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.
A real developer workload: install system packages, download Bun, clone the opencode repo, then run bun install and bun typecheck.
Total workload time
Novita had a 1.19x lower median total workload time (81.07s vs 96.13s for Beam).
4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.
Have another question? Email us.
Beam and Novita were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Beam had a median time to interactive of 548ms versus 1.41s for Novita, 2.57x faster. In DAX (October 30, 2026), Novita had a median total workload time of 81.07s versus 96.13s for Beam, 1.19x faster.