Isorun was faster in both shared sandbox benchmarks.
Median of each benchmark's primary metric; lower is better. Medians within 5% count as roughly even, and a benchmark gets no speed verdict when either provider completed fewer than 50% of runs.
Time from sandbox creation to the first successful command, with 100 sandboxes launched at the same time.
Time to interactive
Isorun had a 18.5x lower median time to interactive (49ms vs 905ms for Buddy).
6 runs from October 2, 2026 to October 30, 2026.
A real developer workload: install system packages, download Bun, clone the opencode repo, then run bun install and bun typecheck.
Total workload time
Isorun had a 1.64x lower median total workload time (36.13s vs 59.09s for Buddy).
4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.
Have another question? Email us.
Isorun was faster in both shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Isorun had a median time to interactive of 49ms versus 905ms for Buddy, 18.5x faster. In DAX (October 30, 2026), Isorun had a median total workload time of 36.13s versus 59.09s for Buddy, 1.64x faster.