Cloudflare and Sail were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks.
Median of each benchmark's primary metric; lower is better. Medians within 5% count as roughly even, and a benchmark gets no speed verdict when either provider completed fewer than 50% of runs.
Time from sandbox creation to the first successful command, with 100 sandboxes launched at the same time.
Time to interactive
Cloudflare had a 2.75x lower median time to interactive (779ms vs 2.14s for Sail).
16 runs from August 7, 2026 to October 30, 2026.
A real developer workload: install system packages, download Bun, clone the opencode repo, then run bun install and bun typecheck.
Total workload time
Sail had a 2.82x lower median total workload time (67.34s vs 189.88s for Cloudflare).
4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.
Each provider's DAX median total workload time (run October 30, 2026) multiplied by its published rate at the 8 vCPU / 16 GiB benchmark spec. Workload time excludes sandbox create and destroy, and subscription floors and included credits are not modeled.
$0.000020/vCPU-s active-CPU + $0.0000025/GiB-s provisioned memory. CPU upper bound at 100% utilization. Requires $5/mo Workers Paid plan.
Source pricing page$0.015/used vCPU-hr + $0.008/used GiB-hr + $0.0007/GiB-hr NVMe — bills observed usage, not reservations (upper bound shown at full utilization). Plus $0.012 per L Sailbox creation. No charge while sleeping.
Source pricing pageHave another question? Email us.
Cloudflare and Sail were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Cloudflare had a median time to interactive of 779ms versus 2.14s for Sail, 2.75x faster. In DAX (October 30, 2026), Sail had a median total workload time of 67.34s versus 189.88s for Cloudflare, 2.82x faster.