Modal and Upstash were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks.
Median of each benchmark's primary metric; lower is better. Medians within 5% count as roughly even, and a benchmark gets no speed verdict when either provider completed fewer than 50% of runs.
Time from sandbox creation to the first successful command, with 100 sandboxes launched at the same time.
Time to interactive
Modal had a 2.57x lower median time to interactive (751ms vs 1.93s for Upstash).
102 runs from April 18, 2026 to October 30, 2026.
A real developer workload: install system packages, download Bun, clone the opencode repo, then run bun install and bun typecheck.
Total workload time
Upstash had a 1.84x lower median total workload time (57.26s vs 105.55s for Modal).
14 runs from July 31, 2026 to October 30, 2026.
Each provider's DAX median total workload time (run October 30, 2026) multiplied by its published rate at the 8 vCPU / 16 GiB benchmark spec. Workload time excludes sandbox create and destroy, and subscription floors and included credits are not modeled.
Sandbox rate $0.00003942/core-s (4 cores = 8 vCPU) + $0.00000667/GiB-s. Regional multipliers (1.25–2.5x) not included.
Source pricing pageLarge box (8 vCPU / 16 GB): $0.40/active-CPU-hour — assumes 100% CPU utilization for the whole build.
Source pricing pageHave another question? Email us.
Modal and Upstash were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Modal had a median time to interactive of 751ms versus 1.93s for Upstash, 2.57x faster. In DAX (October 30, 2026), Upstash had a median total workload time of 57.26s versus 105.55s for Modal, 1.84x faster.