Sail vs SuperserveSandbox Benchmark Comparison

Sail
Faster in 0 of 2
vs
Superserve
Faster in 1 of 2

Superserve was faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks, and 1 was roughly even.

Shared benchmarks
2
Last run
October 30, 2026
Want the full run details?Sign up free →

Scorecard

Median of each benchmark's primary metric; lower is better. Medians within 5% count as roughly even, and a benchmark gets no speed verdict when either provider completed fewer than 50% of runs.

BenchmarkSailSuperserveResultRatio
Burst TTI
Time to interactive · Run October 30, 2026
2.14s
92% success
371ms
100% success
Superserve faster
5.76x
DAX
Total workload time · Run October 30, 2026
67.34s
100% success
64.26s
100% success
Roughly even
1.05x

Burst TTI

Run October 30, 2026

Time from sandbox creation to the first successful command, with 100 sandboxes launched at the same time.

Time to interactive

Sail

92% success
Median
2.14s
P95
2.15s
P99
2.16s
Sail Burst TTI results →

Superserve

100% success
Median
371ms
P95
655ms
P99
705ms
Superserve Burst TTI results →

Superserve had a 5.76x lower median time to interactive (371ms vs 2.14s for Sail).

Median time to interactive over time

16 runs from August 7, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

SailSuperserve
View the full Burst TTI leaderboard →

DAX

Run October 30, 2026

A real developer workload: install system packages, download Bun, clone the opencode repo, then run bun install and bun typecheck.

Total workload time

Sail

100% success
Median
67.34s
P95
67.34s
P99
67.34s
Sail DAX results →

Superserve

100% success
Median
64.26s
P95
64.26s
P99
64.26s
Superserve DAX results →

The medians are within 5% of each other (67.34s vs 64.26s), so this counts as roughly even.

Median total workload time over time

14 runs from August 14, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

SailSuperserve
View the full DAX leaderboard →

Cost per DAX run

Each provider's DAX median total workload time (run October 30, 2026) multiplied by its published rate at the 8 vCPU / 16 GiB benchmark spec. Workload time excludes sandbox create and destroy, and subscription floors and included credits are not modeled.

Sail

Observed usage
$0.0049per run
67.34s median at $0.2620/hr

$0.015/used vCPU-hr + $0.008/used GiB-hr + $0.0007/GiB-hr NVMe — bills observed usage, not reservations (upper bound shown at full utilization). Plus $0.012 per L Sailbox creation. No charge while sleeping.

Source pricing page

Superserve

Per-second wall clock
$0.012per run
64.26s median at $0.6624/hr

$0.0504/vCPU-hr + $0.0162/GiB-hr + storage $0.000108/GiB-hr.

Source pricing page
Compare sandbox costs across all providers →

Methodology

  • One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
  • Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
  • Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
  • How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed at least 50% of runs in 2 or more shared benchmarks run in the last 30 days.

Frequently asked questions

Have another question? Email us.

Superserve was faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks, and 1 was roughly even. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Superserve had a median time to interactive of 371ms versus 2.14s for Sail, 5.76x faster. In DAX (October 30, 2026), Sail had a median total workload time of 67.34s and Superserve 64.26s, which counts as roughly even.

PartnersGoogle Cloud Run