Concentrate AI vs NeonAI Gateway Benchmark Comparison

Concentrate AI
Faster in 0 of 2
vs
Neon
Faster in 2 of 2

Neon was faster in both shared AI gateway benchmarks.

Shared benchmarks
2
Last run
October 30, 2026
Want the full run details?Sign up free →

Scorecard

Median of each benchmark's primary metric; lower is better. Medians within 5% count as roughly even, and a benchmark gets no speed verdict when either provider completed fewer than 50% of runs.

BenchmarkConcentrate AINeonResultRatio
OpenAI
Cold end-to-end latency · Run October 30, 2026
990ms
100% success
830ms
100% success
Neon faster
1.19x
Kimi
Cold end-to-end latency · Run October 30, 2026
2167ms
100% success
947ms
100% success
Neon faster
2.29x

OpenAI

Run October 30, 2026

Time for a cold request routed through the gateway to GPT-5.4 Mini to return its complete response.

Cold end-to-end latency

Concentrate AI

100% success
Median
990ms
P95
1234ms
P99
1244ms
Concentrate AI OpenAI results →

Neon

100% success
Median
830ms
P95
989ms
P99
1022ms
Neon OpenAI results →

Neon had a 1.19x lower median cold end-to-end latency (830ms vs 990ms for Concentrate AI).

Median cold end-to-end latency over time

10 runs from August 21, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

Concentrate AINeon
View the full OpenAI leaderboard →

Kimi

Run October 30, 2026

Time for a cold request routed through the gateway to Kimi K3 to return its complete response.

Cold end-to-end latency

Concentrate AI

100% success
Median
2167ms
P95
2969ms
P99
3072ms
Concentrate AI Kimi results →

Neon

100% success
Median
947ms
P95
1665ms
P99
2312ms
Neon Kimi results →

Neon had a 2.29x lower median cold end-to-end latency (947ms vs 2167ms for Concentrate AI).

Median cold end-to-end latency over time

11 runs from August 21, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

Concentrate AINeon
View the full Kimi leaderboard →

Methodology

  • One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
  • Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
  • Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
  • How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed the latency benchmark on at least two of the same model families reliably: at least 50% success for each provider, in benchmark runs from the last 30 days.

Frequently asked questions

Have another question? Email us.

Neon was faster in both shared AI gateway benchmarks. In OpenAI (October 30, 2026), Neon had a median cold end-to-end latency of 830ms versus 990ms for Concentrate AI, 1.19x faster. In Kimi (October 30, 2026), Neon had a median cold end-to-end latency of 947ms versus 2167ms for Concentrate AI, 2.29x faster.

PartnersGoogle Cloud Run