LLM Gateway vs NeonAI Gateway Benchmark Comparison

LLM Gateway
Faster in 0 of 2
vs
Neon
Faster in 2 of 2

Neon was faster in both shared AI gateway benchmarks.

Shared benchmarks
2
Last run
October 30, 2026
Want the full run details?Sign up free →

Scorecard

Median of each benchmark's primary metric; lower is better. Medians within 5% count as roughly even, and a benchmark gets no speed verdict when either provider completed fewer than 50% of runs.

BenchmarkLLM GatewayNeonResultRatio
OpenAI
Cold end-to-end latency · Run October 30, 2026
1191ms
100% success
830ms
100% success
Neon faster
1.43x
Kimi
Cold end-to-end latency · Run October 30, 2026
2250ms
100% success
947ms
100% success
Neon faster
2.38x

OpenAI

Run October 30, 2026

Time for a cold request routed through the gateway to GPT-5.4 Mini to return its complete response.

Cold end-to-end latency

LLM Gateway

100% success
Median
1191ms
P95
1753ms
P99
1832ms
LLM Gateway OpenAI results →

Neon

100% success
Median
830ms
P95
989ms
P99
1022ms
Neon OpenAI results →

Neon had a 1.43x lower median cold end-to-end latency (830ms vs 1191ms for LLM Gateway).

Median cold end-to-end latency over time

9 runs from August 21, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

LLM GatewayNeon
View the full OpenAI leaderboard →

Kimi

Run October 30, 2026

Time for a cold request routed through the gateway to Kimi K3 to return its complete response.

Cold end-to-end latency

LLM Gateway

100% success
Median
2250ms
P95
3236ms
P99
3281ms
LLM Gateway Kimi results →

Neon

100% success
Median
947ms
P95
1665ms
P99
2312ms
Neon Kimi results →

Neon had a 2.38x lower median cold end-to-end latency (947ms vs 2250ms for LLM Gateway).

Median cold end-to-end latency over time

10 runs from August 21, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

LLM GatewayNeon
View the full Kimi leaderboard →

Methodology

  • One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
  • Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
  • Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
  • How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed the latency benchmark on at least two of the same model families reliably: at least 50% success for each provider, in benchmark runs from the last 30 days.

Frequently asked questions

Have another question? Email us.

Neon was faster in both shared AI gateway benchmarks. In OpenAI (October 30, 2026), Neon had a median cold end-to-end latency of 830ms versus 1191ms for LLM Gateway, 1.43x faster. In Kimi (October 30, 2026), Neon had a median cold end-to-end latency of 947ms versus 2250ms for LLM Gateway, 2.38x faster.

PartnersGoogle Cloud Run