Archil vs Namespace
Sandbox Benchmark Comparison · Updated November 6, 2026
vs
Archil was faster in the only shared sandbox benchmark.
Head to head
- DAXTotal workload time · lower is betterArchil faster1.21x
Archil
45.60sNamespace
55.29s
DAX
Cost per DAX run
Archil
Per-sandbox wall clock$0.0034per run
45.60s median at $0.2700/hr
$0.27/sandbox-hr — but Archil sandboxes are fixed at 2 vCPU / 4 GB, so the spec doesn't match 8/16 and the comparison isn't apples-to-apples.
Source pricing pageNamespace
Per-minute unit minutes$0.012per run
55.29s median at $0.7200/hr
8 vCPU/16 GB shape = 8 unit-min/min at the pay-as-you-go rate of $0.0015/unit-min. Team/Business plans include prepaid minutes at an effective $0.001/unit-min ($0.48/hr). Bills in 1-minute minimums with 15-second rounding.
Source pricing pageWork at Archil or Namespace? See where you stand every day, with full run logs, not just on benchmark Friday.Get stealth benchmarks →
Methodology
- One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
- Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
- Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
- How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published when both providers have at least one successful run in the same benchmark from the last 30 days. A benchmark only gets a verdict when both providers completed at least 50% of its runs. If a provider’s latest run of a benchmark failed, its most recent successful run from that window is used instead.
Frequently asked questions
Have another question? Email us.
Archil was faster in the only shared sandbox benchmark. In DAX (November 6, 2026), Archil had a median total workload time of 45.60s versus 55.29s for Namespace, 1.21x faster.
More comparisons
Archil vs