Cloudflare vs NovitaSandbox Benchmark Comparison

Cloudflare
Faster in 1 of 2
vs
Novita
Faster in 1 of 2

Cloudflare and Novita were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks.

Shared benchmarks
2
Last run
October 30, 2026
Want the full run details?Sign up free →

Scorecard

Median of each benchmark's primary metric; lower is better. Medians within 5% count as roughly even, and a benchmark gets no speed verdict when either provider completed fewer than 50% of runs.

BenchmarkCloudflareNovitaResultRatio
Burst TTI
Time to interactive · Run October 30, 2026
779ms
100% success
1.41s
100% success
Cloudflare faster
1.81x
DAX
Total workload time · Run October 30, 2026
189.88s
100% success
81.07s
100% success
Novita faster
2.34x

Burst TTI

Run October 30, 2026

Time from sandbox creation to the first successful command, with 100 sandboxes launched at the same time.

Time to interactive

Cloudflare

100% success
Median
779ms
P95
1.21s
P99
1.36s
Cloudflare Burst TTI results →

Novita

100% success
Median
1.41s
P95
1.99s
P99
2.03s
Novita Burst TTI results →

Cloudflare had a 1.81x lower median time to interactive (779ms vs 1.41s for Novita).

Median time to interactive over time

4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

CloudflareNovita
View the full Burst TTI leaderboard →

DAX

Run October 30, 2026

A real developer workload: install system packages, download Bun, clone the opencode repo, then run bun install and bun typecheck.

Total workload time

Cloudflare

100% success
Median
189.88s
P95
189.88s
P99
189.88s
Cloudflare DAX results →

Novita

100% success
Median
81.07s
P95
81.07s
P99
81.07s
Novita DAX results →

Novita had a 2.34x lower median total workload time (81.07s vs 189.88s for Cloudflare).

Median total workload time over time

4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

CloudflareNovita
View the full DAX leaderboard →

Methodology

  • One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
  • Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
  • Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
  • How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed at least 50% of runs in 2 or more shared benchmarks run in the last 30 days.

Frequently asked questions

Have another question? Email us.

Cloudflare and Novita were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Cloudflare had a median time to interactive of 779ms versus 1.41s for Novita, 1.81x faster. In DAX (October 30, 2026), Novita had a median total workload time of 81.07s versus 189.88s for Cloudflare, 2.34x faster.

PartnersGoogle Cloud Run