E2B vs NovitaSandbox Benchmark Comparison

E2B
Faster in 2 of 2
vs
Novita
Faster in 0 of 2

E2B was faster in both shared sandbox benchmarks.

Shared benchmarks
2
Last run
October 30, 2026
Want the full run details?Sign up free →

Scorecard

Median of each benchmark's primary metric; lower is better. Medians within 5% count as roughly even, and a benchmark gets no speed verdict when either provider completed fewer than 50% of runs.

BenchmarkE2BNovitaResultRatio
Burst TTI
Time to interactive · Run October 30, 2026
1.27s
100% success
1.41s
100% success
E2B faster
1.11x
DAX
Total workload time · Run October 30, 2026
75.86s
100% success
81.07s
100% success
E2B faster
1.07x

Burst TTI

Run October 30, 2026

Time from sandbox creation to the first successful command, with 100 sandboxes launched at the same time.

Time to interactive

E2B

100% success
Median
1.27s
P95
1.47s
P99
1.70s
E2B Burst TTI results →

Novita

100% success
Median
1.41s
P95
1.99s
P99
2.03s
Novita Burst TTI results →

E2B had a 1.11x lower median time to interactive (1.27s vs 1.41s for Novita).

Median time to interactive over time

4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

E2BNovita
View the full Burst TTI leaderboard →

DAX

Run October 30, 2026

A real developer workload: install system packages, download Bun, clone the opencode repo, then run bun install and bun typecheck.

Total workload time

E2B

100% success
Median
75.86s
P95
75.86s
P99
75.86s
E2B DAX results →

Novita

100% success
Median
81.07s
P95
81.07s
P99
81.07s
Novita DAX results →

E2B had a 1.07x lower median total workload time (75.86s vs 81.07s for Novita).

View the full DAX leaderboard →

Methodology

  • One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
  • Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
  • Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
  • How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed at least 50% of runs in 2 or more shared benchmarks run in the last 30 days.

Frequently asked questions

Have another question? Email us.

E2B was faster in both shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), E2B had a median time to interactive of 1.27s versus 1.41s for Novita, 1.11x faster. In DAX (October 30, 2026), E2B had a median total workload time of 75.86s versus 81.07s for Novita, 1.07x faster.

PartnersGoogle Cloud Run