Mosaic vs NovitaSandbox Benchmark Comparison

Mosaic
Faster in 2 of 2
vs
Novita
Faster in 0 of 2

Mosaic was faster in both shared sandbox benchmarks.

Shared benchmarks
2
Last run
October 30, 2026
Want the full run details?Sign up free →

Scorecard

Median of each benchmark's primary metric; lower is better. Medians within 5% count as roughly even, and a benchmark gets no speed verdict when either provider completed fewer than 50% of runs.

BenchmarkMosaicNovitaResultRatio
Burst TTI
Time to interactive · Run October 30, 2026
889ms
100% success
1.41s
100% success
Mosaic faster
1.58x
DAX
Total workload time · Run October 30, 2026
58.64s
100% success
81.07s
100% success
Mosaic faster
1.38x

Burst TTI

Run October 30, 2026

Time from sandbox creation to the first successful command, with 100 sandboxes launched at the same time.

Time to interactive

Mosaic

100% success
Median
889ms
P95
3.47s
P99
3.53s
Mosaic Burst TTI results →

Novita

100% success
Median
1.41s
P95
1.99s
P99
2.03s
Novita Burst TTI results →

Mosaic had a 1.58x lower median time to interactive (889ms vs 1.41s for Novita).

Median time to interactive over time

4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

MosaicNovita
View the full Burst TTI leaderboard →

DAX

Run October 30, 2026

A real developer workload: install system packages, download Bun, clone the opencode repo, then run bun install and bun typecheck.

Total workload time

Mosaic

100% success
Median
58.64s
P95
58.64s
P99
58.64s
Mosaic DAX results →

Novita

100% success
Median
81.07s
P95
81.07s
P99
81.07s
Novita DAX results →

Mosaic had a 1.38x lower median total workload time (58.64s vs 81.07s for Novita).

Median total workload time over time

4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

MosaicNovita
View the full DAX leaderboard →

Methodology

  • One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
  • Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
  • Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
  • How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed at least 50% of runs in 2 or more shared benchmarks run in the last 30 days.

Frequently asked questions

Have another question? Email us.

Mosaic was faster in both shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Mosaic had a median time to interactive of 889ms versus 1.41s for Novita, 1.58x faster. In DAX (October 30, 2026), Mosaic had a median total workload time of 58.64s versus 81.07s for Novita, 1.38x faster.

PartnersGoogle Cloud Run