Novita vs Sandbox0Sandbox Benchmark Comparison

Novita
Faster in 2 of 2
vs
Sandbox0
Faster in 0 of 2

Novita was faster in both shared sandbox benchmarks.

Shared benchmarks
2
Last run
October 30, 2026
Want the full run details?Sign up free →

Scorecard

Median of each benchmark's primary metric; lower is better. Medians within 5% count as roughly even, and a benchmark gets no speed verdict when either provider completed fewer than 50% of runs.

BenchmarkNovitaSandbox0ResultRatio
Burst TTI
Time to interactive · Run October 30, 2026
1.41s
100% success
10.28s
100% success
Novita faster
7.30x
DAX
Total workload time · Run October 30, 2026
81.07s
100% success
124.96s
100% success
Novita faster
1.54x

Burst TTI

Run October 30, 2026

Time from sandbox creation to the first successful command, with 100 sandboxes launched at the same time.

Time to interactive

Novita

100% success
Median
1.41s
P95
1.99s
P99
2.03s
Novita Burst TTI results →

Sandbox0

100% success
Median
10.28s
P95
22.79s
P99
23.24s
Sandbox0 Burst TTI results →

Novita had a 7.30x lower median time to interactive (1.41s vs 10.28s for Sandbox0).

Median time to interactive over time

4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

NovitaSandbox0
View the full Burst TTI leaderboard →

DAX

Run October 30, 2026

A real developer workload: install system packages, download Bun, clone the opencode repo, then run bun install and bun typecheck.

Total workload time

Novita

100% success
Median
81.07s
P95
81.07s
P99
81.07s
Novita DAX results →

Sandbox0

100% success
Median
124.96s
P95
124.96s
P99
124.96s
Sandbox0 DAX results →

Novita had a 1.54x lower median total workload time (81.07s vs 124.96s for Sandbox0).

Median total workload time over time

4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

NovitaSandbox0
View the full DAX leaderboard →

Methodology

  • One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
  • Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
  • Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
  • How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed at least 50% of runs in 2 or more shared benchmarks run in the last 30 days.

Frequently asked questions

Have another question? Email us.

Novita was faster in both shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Novita had a median time to interactive of 1.41s versus 10.28s for Sandbox0, 7.30x faster. In DAX (October 30, 2026), Novita had a median total workload time of 81.07s versus 124.96s for Sandbox0, 1.54x faster.

PartnersGoogle Cloud Run