Novita vs TenkiSandbox Benchmark Comparison

Novita
Faster in 1 of 2
vs
Tenki
Faster in 1 of 2

Novita and Tenki were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks.

Shared benchmarks
2
Last run
October 30, 2026
Want the full run details?Sign up free →

Scorecard

Median of each benchmark's primary metric; lower is better. Medians within 5% count as roughly even, and a benchmark gets no speed verdict when either provider completed fewer than 50% of runs.

BenchmarkNovitaTenkiResultRatio
Burst TTI
Time to interactive · Run October 30, 2026
1.41s
100% success
2.10s
100% success
Novita faster
1.49x
DAX
Total workload time · Run October 30, 2026
81.07s
100% success
60.78s
100% success
Tenki faster
1.33x

Burst TTI

Run October 30, 2026

Time from sandbox creation to the first successful command, with 100 sandboxes launched at the same time.

Time to interactive

Novita

100% success
Median
1.41s
P95
1.99s
P99
2.03s
Novita Burst TTI results →

Tenki

100% success
Median
2.10s
P95
2.18s
P99
2.18s
Tenki Burst TTI results →

Novita had a 1.49x lower median time to interactive (1.41s vs 2.10s for Tenki).

Median time to interactive over time

4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

NovitaTenki
View the full Burst TTI leaderboard →

DAX

Run October 30, 2026

A real developer workload: install system packages, download Bun, clone the opencode repo, then run bun install and bun typecheck.

Total workload time

Novita

100% success
Median
81.07s
P95
81.07s
P99
81.07s
Novita DAX results →

Tenki

100% success
Median
60.78s
P95
60.78s
P99
60.78s
Tenki DAX results →

Tenki had a 1.33x lower median total workload time (60.78s vs 81.07s for Novita).

Median total workload time over time

4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

NovitaTenki
View the full DAX leaderboard →

Methodology

  • One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
  • Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
  • Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
  • How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed at least 50% of runs in 2 or more shared benchmarks run in the last 30 days.

Frequently asked questions

Have another question? Email us.

Novita and Tenki were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Novita had a median time to interactive of 1.41s versus 2.10s for Tenki, 1.49x faster. In DAX (October 30, 2026), Tenki had a median total workload time of 60.78s versus 81.07s for Novita, 1.33x faster.

PartnersGoogle Cloud Run