Novita vs UpstashSandbox Benchmark Comparison

Novita
Faster in 1 of 2
vs
Upstash
Faster in 1 of 2

Novita and Upstash were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks.

Shared benchmarks
2
Last run
October 30, 2026
Want the full run details?Sign up free →

Scorecard

Median of each benchmark's primary metric; lower is better. Medians within 5% count as roughly even, and a benchmark gets no speed verdict when either provider completed fewer than 50% of runs.

BenchmarkNovitaUpstashResultRatio
Burst TTI
Time to interactive · Run October 30, 2026
1.41s
100% success
1.93s
100% success
Novita faster
1.37x
DAX
Total workload time · Run October 30, 2026
81.07s
100% success
57.26s
100% success
Upstash faster
1.42x

Burst TTI

Run October 30, 2026

Time from sandbox creation to the first successful command, with 100 sandboxes launched at the same time.

Time to interactive

Novita

100% success
Median
1.41s
P95
1.99s
P99
2.03s
Novita Burst TTI results →

Upstash

100% success
Median
1.93s
P95
3.80s
P99
3.97s
Upstash Burst TTI results →

Novita had a 1.37x lower median time to interactive (1.41s vs 1.93s for Upstash).

Median time to interactive over time

4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

NovitaUpstash
View the full Burst TTI leaderboard →

DAX

Run October 30, 2026

A real developer workload: install system packages, download Bun, clone the opencode repo, then run bun install and bun typecheck.

Total workload time

Novita

100% success
Median
81.07s
P95
81.07s
P99
81.07s
Novita DAX results →

Upstash

100% success
Median
57.26s
P95
57.26s
P99
57.26s
Upstash DAX results →

Upstash had a 1.42x lower median total workload time (57.26s vs 81.07s for Novita).

Median total workload time over time

4 runs from October 16, 2026 to October 30, 2026.

NovitaUpstash
View the full DAX leaderboard →

Methodology

  • One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
  • Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
  • Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
  • How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed at least 50% of runs in 2 or more shared benchmarks run in the last 30 days.

Frequently asked questions

Have another question? Email us.

Novita and Upstash were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Novita had a median time to interactive of 1.41s versus 1.93s for Upstash, 1.37x faster. In DAX (October 30, 2026), Upstash had a median total workload time of 57.26s versus 81.07s for Novita, 1.42x faster.

PartnersGoogle Cloud Run