Briq vs sfcompute

Sandbox Benchmark Comparison · Updated November 13, 2026

Briq
Faster in
0of 1 benchmark
#32 of 33 in Sandbox Provider Rating
vs
sfcompute
Faster in
1of 1 benchmark
#13 of 33 in Sandbox Provider Rating

sfcompute was faster in the only sandbox benchmark with a speed verdict.

Head to head

  • Burst TTI
    Time to interactive · lower is better
    sfcompute faster16.4x
    Briq
    5.72s
    sfcompute
    350ms
  • DAX
    Total workload time · lower is better
    No verdict
    Briq
    64.47s
    sfcompute
    —

Burst TTI

November 13, 2026
Full leaderboard

Briq

100% success
Median
5.72s
p95
8.31s
p99
8.68s
Briq Burst TTI results

sfcompute

100% success
Median
350ms
p95
482ms
p99
510ms
sfcompute Burst TTI results

DAX

November 13, 2026
Full leaderboard

Briq

100% success
Median
64.47s
Briq DAX results

sfcompute

0% success

No measured time in this run.

sfcompute DAX results
Work at Briq or sfcompute? See where you stand every day, with full run logs, not just on benchmark Friday.Get stealth benchmarks →

Methodology

  • One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
  • Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
  • Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
  • How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published when both providers have at least one successful run in the same benchmark from the last 30 days. A benchmark only gets a verdict when both providers completed at least 50% of its runs. If a provider’s latest run of a benchmark failed, its most recent successful run from that window is used instead.
Read the full methodology →Raw results on GitHub ↗

Frequently asked questions

Have another question? Email us.

sfcompute was faster in the only sandbox benchmark with a speed verdict. In Burst TTI (November 13, 2026), sfcompute had a median time to interactive of 350ms versus 5.72s for Briq, 16.4x faster.

Both providers have results in 2 sandbox benchmarks: Burst TTI and DAX. 1 of them has a speed verdict.

Success rates in the latest runs: Burst TTI: Briq 100%, sfcompute 100%; DAX: Briq 100%, sfcompute 0%. DAX has no speed verdict because sfcompute completed fewer than half of its runs; Briq's median total workload time was 64.47s.

Burst TTI and DAX results are from November 13, 2026.