Briq vs Tenki
Sandbox Benchmark Comparison · Updated November 13, 2026
vs
Briq and Tenki were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks.
Head to head
- Time to interactive · lower is betterTenki faster6.59x
Briq
5.72sTenki
869ms - Total workload time · lower is betterBriq faster1.06x64.47s68.16s
Burst TTI
DAX
Work at Briq or Tenki? See where you stand every day, with full run logs, not just on benchmark Friday.Get stealth benchmarks →
Methodology
- One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
- Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
- Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
- How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published when both providers have at least one successful run in the same benchmark from the last 30 days. A benchmark only gets a verdict when both providers completed at least 50% of its runs. If a provider’s latest run of a benchmark failed, its most recent successful run from that window is used instead.
Frequently asked questions
Have another question? Email us.
Briq and Tenki were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (November 13, 2026), Tenki had a median time to interactive of 869ms versus 5.72s for Briq, 6.59x faster. In DAX (November 13, 2026), Briq had a median total workload time of 64.47s versus 68.16s for Tenki, 1.06x faster.
Both providers have results in 2 sandbox benchmarks: Burst TTI and DAX. All of them have a speed verdict.
Success rates in the latest runs: Burst TTI: Briq 100%, Tenki 100%; DAX: Briq 100%, Tenki 100%.
Burst TTI and DAX results are from November 13, 2026.
More comparisons
Briq vs