Briq vs Promigence

Sandbox Benchmark Comparison · Updated November 13, 2026

Briq
Faster in
0of 2 benchmarks
#32 of 33 in Sandbox Provider Rating
vs
PromigencePre-release
Faster in
2of 2 benchmarks
#28 of 33 in Sandbox Provider Rating

Promigence was faster in both shared sandbox benchmarks.

Head to head

  • Burst TTI
    Time to interactive · lower is better
    Promigence faster35.3x
    Briq
    5.72s
    Promigence
    162ms
  • DAX
    Total workload time · lower is better
    Promigence faster2.01x
    Briq
    64.47s
    Promigence
    32.10s

Burst TTI

November 13, 2026
Full leaderboard

Briq

100% success
Median
5.72s
p95
8.31s
p99
8.68s
Briq Burst TTI results

Promigence

100% success
Median
162ms
p95
244ms
p99
245ms
Promigence Burst TTI results

DAX

November 13, 2026
Full leaderboard

Briq

100% success
Median
64.47s
Briq DAX results

Promigence

100% success
Median
32.10s
Promigence DAX results
Work at Briq or Promigence? See where you stand every day, with full run logs, not just on benchmark Friday.Get stealth benchmarks →

Methodology

  • One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
  • Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
  • Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
  • How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published when both providers have at least one successful run in the same benchmark from the last 30 days. A benchmark only gets a verdict when both providers completed at least 50% of its runs. If a provider’s latest run of a benchmark failed, its most recent successful run from that window is used instead.
Read the full methodology →Raw results on GitHub ↗

Frequently asked questions

Have another question? Email us.

Promigence was faster in both shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (November 13, 2026), Promigence had a median time to interactive of 162ms versus 5.72s for Briq, 35.3x faster. In DAX (November 13, 2026), Promigence had a median total workload time of 32.10s versus 64.47s for Briq, 2.01x faster.

Both providers have results in 2 sandbox benchmarks: Burst TTI and DAX. All of them have a speed verdict.

Success rates in the latest runs: Burst TTI: Briq 100%, Promigence 100%; DAX: Briq 100%, Promigence 100%.

Burst TTI and DAX results are from November 13, 2026.