Browser Use vs Kernel

Browser Benchmark Comparison · Updated October 30, 2026

vs
Ahead in
2of 2 benchmarks
#2 of 7 in Browser Composite

Kernel was ahead in both shared browser benchmarks.

Head to head

  • Browser lifecycleTotal lifecycle time · lower is better
    Kernel faster1.52x
    Browser Use
    0.33s
    Kernel
    0.22s
  • Browser throughputActions per second · higher is better
    Kernel higher throughput1.56x
    Browser Use
    3.76 actions/s
    Kernel
    5.86 actions/s99%

Browser lifecycle

October 30, 2026

Browser Use

100% success
Median
0.33s
p95
0.39s
p99
0.41s
Browser Use Browser lifecycle results

Kernel

100% success
Median
0.22s
p95
0.26s
p99
0.27s
Kernel Browser lifecycle results

Median total lifecycle time over time

30 runs · June 30, 2026 to October 30, 2026
Browser UseKernel

Browser throughput

Browser Use

100% success · October 9, 2026
Median
3.76 actions/s
p95
4.89 actions/s
p99
5.11 actions/s
Browser Use Browser throughput results

Kernel

99% success · October 30, 2026
Median
5.86 actions/s
p95
7.33 actions/s
p99
7.42 actions/s
Kernel Browser throughput results

Median actions per second over time

22 runs · July 7, 2026 to October 30, 2026
Browser UseKernel
Work at Browser Use or Kernel? See where you stand every day, with full run logs, not just on benchmark Friday.Get stealth benchmarks →

Methodology

  • One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
  • Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
  • Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
  • How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed at least 50% of runs in 2 or more shared benchmarks run in the last 30 days. If a provider’s latest run of a benchmark failed, its most recent successful run from that window is used instead.

Frequently asked questions

Have another question? Email us.

Kernel was ahead in both shared browser benchmarks. In Browser lifecycle (October 30, 2026), Kernel had a median total lifecycle time of 0.22s versus 0.33s for Browser Use, 1.52x faster. In Browser throughput (October 9, 2026), Kernel had a median actions per second of 5.86 actions/s versus 3.76 actions/s for Browser Use, 1.56x higher throughput.

PartnersGoogle Cloud Run