Kernel vs Notte

Browser Benchmark Comparison · Updated October 30, 2026

Ahead in
2of 2 benchmarks
#2 of 7 in Browser Composite
vs
Ahead in
0of 2 benchmarks
#5 of 7 in Browser Composite

Kernel was ahead in both shared browser benchmarks.

Head to head

  • Browser lifecycleTotal lifecycle time · lower is better
    Kernel faster7.77x
    Kernel
    0.22s
    Notte
    1.67s
  • Browser throughputActions per second · higher is better
    Kernel higher throughput4.41x
    Kernel
    5.86 actions/s99%
    Notte
    1.33 actions/s

Browser lifecycle

October 30, 2026

Kernel

100% success
Median
0.22s
p95
0.26s
p99
0.27s
Kernel Browser lifecycle results

Notte

100% success
Median
1.67s
p95
1.90s
p99
1.95s
Notte Browser lifecycle results

Median total lifecycle time over time

29 runs · June 30, 2026 to October 30, 2026
KernelNotte

Browser throughput

Kernel

99% success · October 30, 2026
Median
5.86 actions/s
p95
7.33 actions/s
p99
7.42 actions/s
Kernel Browser throughput results

Notte

100% success · October 9, 2026
Median
1.33 actions/s
p95
1.47 actions/s
p99
1.48 actions/s
Notte Browser throughput results

Median actions per second over time

21 runs · July 7, 2026 to October 30, 2026
KernelNotte
Work at Kernel or Notte? See where you stand every day, with full run logs, not just on benchmark Friday.Get stealth benchmarks →

Methodology

  • One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
  • Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
  • Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
  • How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed at least 50% of runs in 2 or more shared benchmarks run in the last 30 days. If a provider’s latest run of a benchmark failed, its most recent successful run from that window is used instead.

Frequently asked questions

Have another question? Email us.

Kernel was ahead in both shared browser benchmarks. In Browser lifecycle (October 30, 2026), Kernel had a median total lifecycle time of 0.22s versus 1.67s for Notte, 7.77x faster. In Browser throughput (October 9, 2026), Kernel had a median actions per second of 5.86 actions/s versus 1.33 actions/s for Notte, 4.41x higher throughput.

PartnersGoogle Cloud Run