Hyperbrowser vs Kernel
Browser Benchmark Comparison · Updated October 30, 2026
vs
Kernel was ahead in both shared browser benchmarks.
Head to head
- Browser lifecycleTotal lifecycle time · lower is betterKernel faster3.21x
Hyperbrowser
0.69sKernel
0.22s - Browser throughputActions per second · higher is betterKernel higher throughput2.10x2.79 actions/s66%5.86 actions/s99%
Browser lifecycle
Median total lifecycle time over time
HyperbrowserKernel
Browser throughput
Hyperbrowser
66% success · October 16, 2026Median
2.79 actions/s
p95
3.63 actions/s
p99
3.77 actions/s
Kernel
99% success · October 30, 2026Median
5.86 actions/s
p95
7.33 actions/s
p99
7.42 actions/s
Median actions per second over time
HyperbrowserKernel
Work at Hyperbrowser or Kernel? See where you stand every day, with full run logs, not just on benchmark Friday.Get stealth benchmarks →
Methodology
- One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
- Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
- Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
- How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed at least 50% of runs in 2 or more shared benchmarks run in the last 30 days. If a provider’s latest run of a benchmark failed, its most recent successful run from that window is used instead.
Frequently asked questions
Have another question? Email us.
Kernel was ahead in both shared browser benchmarks. In Browser lifecycle (October 30, 2026), Kernel had a median total lifecycle time of 0.22s versus 0.69s for Hyperbrowser, 3.21x faster. In Browser throughput (October 16, 2026), Kernel had a median actions per second of 5.86 actions/s versus 2.79 actions/s for Hyperbrowser, 2.10x higher throughput.
More comparisons
Hyperbrowser vs