Sandbox Benchmark Comparison · Updated October 30, 2026
Daytona and Vercel were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks.
$0.000014/vCPU-s + $0.0000045/GiB-s — identical rates to E2B. Creating/stopping transitions bill as running.
Source pricing page$0.128/active-CPU-hr per vCPU + $0.0212/GB-hr provisioned memory (wall clock). CPU upper bound at 100% utilization; real bills for I/O-bound runs are lower.
Source pricing pageHave another question? Email us.
Daytona and Vercel were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Vercel had a median time to interactive of 423ms versus 668ms for Daytona, 1.58x faster. In DAX (October 23, 2026), Daytona had a median total workload time of 74.40s versus 83.37s for Vercel, 1.12x faster.