Beam vs Daytona
Sandbox Benchmark Comparison · Updated October 30, 2026
vs
Beam and Daytona were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks.
Head to head
Burst TTI
Median time to interactive over time
BeamDaytona
Median total workload time over time
BeamDaytona
Cost per DAX run
Beam
Per-second wall clock$0.024per run
96.13s median at $0.9086/hr
$0.0000375/core-s (1 core = 2 vCPU, so 4 cores) + $0.0000064/GiB-s.
Source pricing pageDaytona
Per-second wall clock$0.014per run
74.40s median at $0.6624/hr
$0.000014/vCPU-s + $0.0000045/GiB-s — identical rates to E2B. Creating/stopping transitions bill as running.
Source pricing pageWork at Beam or Daytona? See where you stand every day, with full run logs, not just on benchmark Friday.Get stealth benchmarks →
Methodology
- One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
- Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
- Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
- How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed at least 50% of runs in 2 or more shared benchmarks run in the last 30 days. If a provider’s latest run of a benchmark failed, its most recent successful run from that window is used instead.
Frequently asked questions
Have another question? Email us.
Beam and Daytona were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Beam had a median time to interactive of 548ms versus 668ms for Daytona, 1.22x faster. In DAX (October 23, 2026), Daytona had a median total workload time of 74.40s versus 96.13s for Beam, 1.29x faster.
More comparisons
Beam vs