Sandbox Benchmark Comparison · Updated October 30, 2026
Daytona was faster in both shared sandbox benchmarks.
$0.000014/vCPU-s + $0.0000045/GiB-s — identical rates to E2B. Creating/stopping transitions bill as running.
Source pricing page$0.07/core-hr active CPU + $0.015/GB-hr RAM (on-demand rates; Pro is ~40% lower).
Source pricing pageHave another question? Email us.
Daytona was faster in both shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Daytona had a median time to interactive of 668ms versus 1.03s for Tensorlake, 1.54x faster. In DAX (October 23, 2026), Daytona had a median total workload time of 74.40s versus 78.16s for Tensorlake, 1.05x faster.