Microsandbox vs Tensorlake

Sandbox Benchmark Comparison · Updated October 30, 2026

Microsandbox
Faster in
1of 2 benchmarks
#22 of 32 in Sandbox Provider Rating
vs
Tensorlake
Faster in
1of 2 benchmarks
#7 of 32 in Sandbox Provider Rating

Microsandbox and Tensorlake were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks.

Head to head

  • Burst TTITime to interactive · lower is better
    Tensorlake faster4.62x
    Microsandbox
    4.74s
    Tensorlake
    1.03s
  • DAXTotal workload time · lower is better
    Microsandbox faster1.60x
    Microsandbox
    48.76s
    Tensorlake
    78.16s

Burst TTI

October 30, 2026
Full leaderboard

Microsandbox

100% success
Median
4.74s
p95
5.15s
p99
5.26s
Microsandbox Burst TTI results

Tensorlake

100% success
Median
1.03s
p95
2.24s
p99
5.25s
Tensorlake Burst TTI results

Median time to interactive over time

11 runs · August 21, 2026 to October 30, 2026
MicrosandboxTensorlake

DAX

October 23, 2026
Full leaderboard

Microsandbox

100% success
Median
48.76s
Microsandbox DAX results

Tensorlake

100% success
Median
78.16s
Tensorlake DAX results

Median total workload time over time

4 runs · October 2, 2026 to October 23, 2026
MicrosandboxTensorlake

Cost per DAX run

Microsandbox

Per-second wall clock
$0.0089per run
48.76s median at $0.6592/hr

$0.05/vCPU-hr + $0.0162/GiB-hr + disk $0.0001/GiB-hr. Plans include monthly compute pools.

Source pricing page

Tensorlake

Active CPU + allocated RAM
$0.017per run
78.16s median at $0.8000/hr

$0.07/core-hr active CPU + $0.015/GB-hr RAM (on-demand rates; Pro is ~40% lower).

Source pricing page
Compare sandbox costs across all providers →
Work at Microsandbox or Tensorlake? See where you stand every day, with full run logs, not just on benchmark Friday.Get stealth benchmarks →

Methodology

  • One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
  • Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
  • Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
  • How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed at least 50% of runs in 2 or more shared benchmarks run in the last 30 days. If a provider’s latest run of a benchmark failed, its most recent successful run from that window is used instead.
Read the full methodology →Raw results on GitHub ↗

Frequently asked questions

Have another question? Email us.

Microsandbox and Tensorlake were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Tensorlake had a median time to interactive of 1.03s versus 4.74s for Microsandbox, 4.62x faster. In DAX (October 23, 2026), Microsandbox had a median total workload time of 48.76s versus 78.16s for Tensorlake, 1.60x faster.

PartnersGoogle Cloud Run