E2B vs Microsandbox
Sandbox Benchmark Comparison · Updated October 30, 2026
vs
E2B and Microsandbox were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks.
Head to head
Burst TTI
Median time to interactive over time
E2BMicrosandbox
Cost per DAX run
E2B
Per-second wall clock$0.014per run
75.86s median at $0.6624/hr
$0.000014/vCPU-s + $0.0000045/GiB-s. Disk (20 GiB Pro) included.
Source pricing pageMicrosandbox
Per-second wall clock$0.0089per run
48.76s median at $0.6592/hr
$0.05/vCPU-hr + $0.0162/GiB-hr + disk $0.0001/GiB-hr. Plans include monthly compute pools.
Source pricing pageWork at E2B or Microsandbox? See where you stand every day, with full run logs, not just on benchmark Friday.Get stealth benchmarks →
Methodology
- One workload, every provider. The same script, payload, and model hit every provider, addressed the way its own API expects. Nobody gets a tuned or special path.
- Repeated on a schedule. Every suite runs many iterations per provider, automated on a recurring schedule, so results reflect steady state rather than one lucky request.
- Raw results published. Every run is committed as JSON to the public benchmarks repo, next to the code that produced it. Nothing is cherry-picked or held back.
- How this comparison is built. Each benchmark compares the two providers' medians; results within 5% count as roughly even. A comparison is published only when both providers completed at least 50% of runs in 2 or more shared benchmarks run in the last 30 days. If a provider’s latest run of a benchmark failed, its most recent successful run from that window is used instead.
Frequently asked questions
Have another question? Email us.
E2B and Microsandbox were each faster in 1 of 2 shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), E2B had a median time to interactive of 1.27s versus 4.74s for Microsandbox, 3.74x faster. In DAX (October 23, 2026), Microsandbox had a median total workload time of 48.76s versus 75.86s for E2B, 1.56x faster.
More comparisons
E2B vs