Sandbox Benchmark Comparison · Updated October 30, 2026
Tensorlake was faster in both shared sandbox benchmarks.
$0.015/GiB-hr on the memory limit (16 GiB), billed by the second. Paused sandboxes stop compute charges.
Source pricing page$0.07/core-hr active CPU + $0.015/GB-hr RAM (on-demand rates; Pro is ~40% lower).
Source pricing pageHave another question? Email us.
Tensorlake was faster in both shared sandbox benchmarks. In Burst TTI (October 30, 2026), Tensorlake had a median time to interactive of 1.03s versus 10.28s for Sandbox0, 10.0x faster. In DAX (October 23, 2026), Tensorlake had a median total workload time of 78.16s versus 124.96s for Sandbox0, 1.60x faster.